News RSS Feed


Council defeated in court windfarm bid

4:34pm Tuesday 1st July 2008

comment Comments (8)   Have your say »


REDCAR and Cleveland Borough Council has suffered a stinging defeat in its High Court bid to block plans for a massive wind farm off the North-East coast.

Council lawyers argued at London's High Court that Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, John Hutton, had been wrong not to direct a full public inquiry before giving the go-ahead to the ambitious power generation scheme.

Mr Hutton gave his consent for the construction of the farm by EDF Energy, last September, paving the way for 30 enormous turbines to be built around a mile off the coast at Redcar.

However, the council went to court after receiving thousands of objections from local residents opposed to the wind farm which, they fear, could be an overpowering eyesore.

However, after a costly, two-day, High Court hearing, Mr Justice Sullivan, today dismissed the council's judicial review challenge.

He said: "I am fundamentally of the view that this application must be rejected. The mere assertion that a wind farm may spoil the outlook generally, and may effect the value of property, is not a sufficient basis on which a challenge can be based.

"In this case, the principle issue, visual impact, is very much a matter of judgment and whether that visual impact would be outweighed by national energy policy".

He said Mr Hutton had "ample material", in the form of a "very comprehensive report", on which he based his decision and had taken into account all factors he was obliged to.

The judge will give more detailed reasons for his decision at a later date.

The wind farm plans involve 30 turbines, up to 132 metres above the high-water mark, standing in rows of ten, approximately 300 metres apart.

But objectors say the turbines would be too close to the shoreline, could overwhelm the town and are bound to impact on local property prices.

Full story in tomorrow's The Northern Echo


Your Say YourNorth-East

Kathleen Boden, Darlington says...
5:55pm Tue 1 Jul 08

First we cut down all the trees to burn for charcoal to fuel industry, Then we paved over any available arable land to build roads and houses. Now it seems we are to put a wind farm along every kilometer of the land to provide power. Soon there will be no land left. Not being content with ravaging the land we are eating up the ocean floor with oil derricks , wind and wave farms. when are we going to change our power hungry ways.

I'm a believer, Darlington says...
7:26pm Tue 1 Jul 08

Kathleen Boden wrote:
First we cut down all the trees to burn for charcoal to fuel industry, Then we paved over any available arable land to build roads and houses. Now it seems we are to put a wind farm along every kilometer of the land to provide power. Soon there will be no land left. Not being content with ravaging the land we are eating up the ocean floor with oil derricks , wind and wave farms. when are we going to change our power hungry ways.
I'm guessing you are using your computer from power supplied by your very own eco fuel powered generator then.

Kathleen Boden, Darlington says...
8:49pm Tue 1 Jul 08

No I'm just pointing out how mankind has over the time he has been on earth has changed this planet. And it's about time people thought about it. If you want to be facetious go for it, but if I made you think then that's all I was trying to do. I do what I can but it's never going to be enough unless everyone does. .

Kelly, dton says...
10:27pm Tue 1 Jul 08

If redcar improoved the sea front and made it appealing to people to come visit the town more i could understand the objection. NOw dont get me wrong i love redcar, and love nothing more than a walk along the beach, fish and chips a few pound in the amusements and then home, but when you compare it to scarbourgh, whitby, hartlepool, its pretty bottom of the scale on the looks of things. I think they should concentrate on making it more appealing to people before they can argue that the wind turbines are going to be an eyesore, becuase the buildings opposits the sea front are more of an eye sore than a few wind turbines

Dan, Gateshead says...
10:41pm Tue 1 Jul 08

I often wonder whether people have ever seen a windfarm in real life before they post such drivel on "eye sores". If any of you have been to Liverpool port and/or flown over the Irish sea you'd agree that it looks pretty breath taking. Its certainly less of an eyesore than the Nuclear power plant which would be needed to create the equivalent power.

bonnylad, northeast says...
11:09pm Tue 1 Jul 08

At least a nuclear power station creates power when the wind isn't blowing. They should use the money to replace Hartlepool's station instead of these white elephants.

ricky, coventry says...
11:52pm Tue 1 Jul 08

That's a good point by I'm a believer regarding the drivel that Kathleen Boden writes. How can she sit there on her power hungry computer typing nonsense about wasting electcity? She should go and live in a cave and then we would not have to read her senile ramblings about wind farms.

kd, consett says...
8:10pm Wed 2 Jul 08

Dan wrote:
I often wonder whether people have ever seen a windfarm in real life before they post such drivel on \"eye sores\". If any of you have been to Liverpool port and/or flown over the Irish sea you\'d agree that it looks pretty breath taking. Its certainly less of an eyesore than the Nuclear power plant which would be needed to create the equivalent power.
Dan
Have you ever seen a nuclear power station?
They look breathtaking

Your sayYourNorth-East

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Northern Echo account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Sponsored Links


Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »